Outdated Tools
The official poverty measure was created half a century ago and fails to accurately estimate current need.
This KIDS COUNT data snapshot illustrates how outdated methods measuring poverty in the United States are giving an inaccurate picture of how families are really faring and what public programs are actually working. The brief introduces the more accurate Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) and shows how government programs affect state poverty rates. Recommendations on targeting families in need give policymakers input on implementing efficient and cost-effective public programs.
The Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) shows the effectiveness of government programs in helping the poor. The data show that without any government interventions the child poverty rate would nearly double, from 18% to 33%.
The official poverty measure was created half a century ago and fails to accurately estimate current need.
Using the Supplemental Poverty Measure, California has the highest child poverty rate among states, followed by Arizona and Nevada.
On average, families of 4 need an income of roughly twice the official annual poverty threshold of $24,000 to cover the entire cost of basic expenses: housing, food, transportation, health care and child care.
The Supplemental Poverty Measure created in 2011 shows that the rate of children in poverty has declined since 1990 while the official measure shows no real change.
Regional patterns in child poverty differ from the traditional poverty measure.
We hope you'll find value in this report. We’d love to get a little information from you, which we'll use to notify you about relevant new resources.
