Resolution, Reinvestment, and Realignment

Three Strategies for Changing Juvenile Justice

Posted September 6, 2011
By Research and Evaluation Center at John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Get the Full Report:
Download Report
Aecf resolutionreinvestmentrealignment cover


Putting kids behind bars is more a local policy choice than an actual safety issue. What lawmakers do depends not only on budgets and safety, but on the political climate. And that differs drastically from state to state. Down-sizing corrections is a growing strategy as falling crime rates allow lawmakers to focus on cost-effectiveness and the impact of juvenile justice policy. This report reviews the history and development of three juvenile justice reform strategies and analyzes their impact on policy, practice and public safety.

Findings & Stats

Statements & Quotations

Key Takeaway

Incarceration does not reduce recidivism and may aggravate problems with school, work and behavior.

Lawmakers like that youth confinement costs can be lowered without endangering public safety.