Community Engagement in the Science and Study of Gun Violence
How Researchers Can Better Partner With Communities Most Affected by Gun Violence
Communities most affected by gun violence are often the subject of research, but the people who live in these communities have limited influence over how studies are designed and conducted. A new guide aims to change that by offering practical recommendations for researchers seeking to build meaningful partnerships with community members and practitioners.
The guide, Practices for Conducting Community-Engaged Research With Those at Highest-Risk for Gun Violence, was developed by the Black & Brown Collective for Community Solutions to Gun Violence and funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
New Community-Engaged Research Guide Focuses on Gun Violence Prevention
The groundbreaking document details how researchers can engage safely, responsibly and effectively with people who face the highest risk from violence and the practitioners who work closely with them. It emphasizes building trust and understanding the structural, historical and power dynamics that shape the research process.
“As far as we know, this is the first-ever guide for conducting community-engaged research with people and communities most at risk of gun violence,” said Rod Martinez, a senior research associate on Casey’s Research and Evaluation team. He and colleagues on Casey’s National Community Strategies team worked with the Black & Brown Collective as part of an expert workshop that also included people working in their own communities to prevent violence.
The guide relies on the insights of community safety scholars, funders, practitioners and advocates, as well as a comprehensive review of existing gun violence research that uses community engagement. The framework is also informed by scholarship related to community-engaged and participatory-action research, while focusing on practices that help researchers navigate the relational, ethical and safety considerations when working in communities at high-risk of gun violence.
Six Best Practices for Community-Engaged Gun Violence Research
The authors identified six key practices for researchers working in communities at high risk of violence:
- Treat research as an opportunity for shared leadership with the community.
- Build and sustain relationships with communities before, during and after research.
- Use research practices that demonstrate the value of community accountability.
- Build research teams with the skills to ethically engage communities.
- Budget for fair compensation, participant support and community co-leadership from the start.
- Design research instruments, processes and dissemination strategies with the community.
The guide encourages researchers to involve community members not only as participants but also as partners in shaping research questions, methods and priorities, resulting in more relevant data and sustainable solutions.
“We contend that community-engaged research practices that are explicit in their approach to those at highest risk have greater potential to inform policy and practice solutions that can improve community safety,” the guide states.
“We have landed on a set of practices that we contend are essential for researchers exploring issues in communities with high rates of gun violence,” said Jocelyn Fontaine, executive director of the Collective and a co-author of the guide. “These are practical and adaptable practices that can inform a range of research approaches and can help ensure researchers focus on the key principles of equity and accountability.”
Community Violence Intervention Research Library Expands Access to Evidence
The Collective has also created the Community Violence Intervention Research Library, a compilation of dozens of research studies about community violence intervention. This regularly updated library includes research focused on intervention models, survivor experiences, structural determinants of violence and the realities facing frontline practitioners.
“This research library is an important resource with some of the latest and most meaningful evidence that exists on the issue,” Martinez said. “By making it publicly available, the Collective is putting that knowledge directly in the hands of the communities and practitioners who need it most.”
Together, the guide and research library offer tools to help researchers, practitioners and funders strengthen community partnerships and produce research that better informs efforts to improve safety and well-being in communities across the United States.
These guiding questions help advance equity in evaluation and research