Reliance on Incarcerating Youth Offenders Not Paying Off for States, Taxpayers or Kids, Report Finds - The Annie E. Casey Foundation

Reliance on Incarcerating Youth Offenders Not Paying Off for States, Taxpayers or Kids, Report Finds

Posted October 4, 2011
By the Annie E. Casey Foundation
Newsrelease noplaceforkids 2011

Lock­ing up juve­nile offend­ers in cor­rec­tion­al facil­i­ties, which costs states a year­ly aver­age of $88,000 per youth, is not pay­ing off from a pub­lic safe­ty, reha­bil­i­ta­tion or cost per­spec­tive, accord­ing to a new report from the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion. The report doc­u­ments four decades of scan­dals and law­suits over abu­sive con­di­tions in juve­nile insti­tu­tions and rein­forces the grow­ing con­sen­sus among experts that the cur­rent incar­cer­a­tion mod­el pro­vides lit­tle pub­lic safe­ty ben­e­fit. Its release, at a time when states nation­wide are strug­gling with enor­mous bud­get deficits and look­ing for ways to trim spend­ing, also high­lights an emerg­ing trend in which at least 18 states have closed more than 50 juve­nile cor­rec­tions facil­i­ties over the past four years.

No Place for Kids: The Case for Reduc­ing Juve­nile Incar­cer­a­tion is the most com­pre­hen­sive recent analy­sis of research and new data on the effec­tive­ness and costs of juve­nile incar­cer­a­tion. The report con­cludes that there is now over­whelm­ing evi­dence that the whole­sale incar­cer­a­tion of juve­nile offend­ers is a failed strat­e­gy for com­bat­ing youth crime because it:

  • Does not reduce future offend­ing by con­fined youth: With­in three years of release, rough­ly three-quar­ters of youth are rear­rest­ed; up to 72%, depend­ing on indi­vid­ual state mea­sures, are con­vict­ed of a new offense.
     
  • Does not enhance pub­lic safe­ty: States which low­ered juve­nile con­fine­ment rates the most from 1997 to 2007 saw a greater decline in juve­nile vio­lent crime arrests than states which increased incar­cer­a­tion rates or reduced them more slowly.
     
  • Wastes tax­pay­er dol­lars: Nation­wide, states con­tin­ue to spend the bulk of their juve­nile jus­tice bud­gets – $5 bil­lion in 2008 – to con­fine and house young offend­ers in incar­cer­a­tion facil­i­ties despite evi­dence show­ing that alter­na­tive in-home or com­mu­ni­ty-based pro­grams can deliv­er equal or bet­ter results for a frac­tion of the cost.
     
  • Expos­es youth to vio­lence and abuse: In near­ly half of the states, per­sis­tent mal­treat­ment has been doc­u­ment­ed since 2000 in at least one state-fund­ed insti­tu­tion. One in eight con­fined youth report­ed being sex­u­al­ly abused by staff or oth­er youth and 42% feared phys­i­cal attack accord­ing to reports released in 2010.

Rough­ly 60,500 U.S. youth – dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly young peo­ple of col­or – are con­fined in juve­nile cor­rec­tion­al facil­i­ties or oth­er res­i­den­tial pro­grams on any giv­en night, accord­ing to an offi­cial nation­al count of youth in cor­rec­tion­al cus­tody con­duct­ed in 2007. That is more ado­les­cents than cur­rent­ly reside in cities like Bal­ti­more, MD and Nashville, TN.

The report also tracks a notable trend in recent years among a grow­ing num­ber of states that have shut­tered youth incar­cer­a­tion facil­i­ties and sub­stan­tial­ly shrunk the num­ber of con­fined youth, often prompt­ed by bud­get crises or abuse scan­dals. No Place for Kids high­lights six rec­om­men­da­tions for how state and local juve­nile jus­tice offi­cials can alter youth incar­cer­a­tion pat­terns and improve sys­tem out­comes, not­ing that the recent declines in youth con­fine­ment have not gen­er­al­ly been accom­pa­nied by com­pre­hen­sive reforms that max­i­mize both pub­lic safe­ty and pos­i­tive youth development.

The tra­di­tion­al approach of lock­ing up youth offend­ers whole­sale – even those with lim­it­ed his­to­ries of seri­ous or vio­lent offend­ing – has con­tin­ued for decades with­out any evi­dence that it helps kids or pro­tects the pub­lic,” says Bart Lubow, direc­tor of the Juve­nile Jus­tice Strat­e­gy Group at the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion and for­mer direc­tor of Alter­na­tives to Incar­cer­a­tion for New York State. This report high­lights the cru­cial chal­lenges fac­ing the youth cor­rec­tions field. Our hope is that the research will serve as a cat­a­lyst for devel­op­ing more effec­tive and effi­cient juve­nile jus­tice strategies.”

This post is related to: