Studies Show Dramatic Racial Disparities in Front End of Juvenile Justice System - The Annie E. Casey Foundation

Studies Show Dramatic Racial Disparities in Front End of Juvenile Justice System

Posted April 20, 2021
By the Annie E. Casey Foundation
Young black youth

Two peer-reviewed stud­ies doc­u­ment an alarm­ing­ly unequal juve­nile jus­tice sys­tem, par­tic­u­lar­ly for Black youth. The stud­ies point to sys­temic respons­es that result in harsh­er treat­ment for youth of col­or — espe­cial­ly Black youth — than non-His­pan­ic white youth at the front end of juve­nile jus­tice, start­ing with police encoun­ters before young peo­ple even reach high school. Glar­ing dis­par­i­ties by race and eth­nic­i­ty per­sist, accord­ing to the stud­ies, and dif­fer­ences in behav­ior can­not account for the over­rep­re­sen­ta­tion of youth of col­or in the jus­tice sys­tem.

All young peo­ple should be able to mature into adult­hood with­out being thrown off track by the neg­a­tive effects of jus­tice sys­tem involve­ment,” says Jaqui­ta Mon­roe, a senior asso­ciate with the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion. The more that research tells us about the sys­temic bias that’s dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly harm­ing Black, Lati­no and oth­er youth of col­or, the more urgent it becomes to address pre­dictable ado­les­cent mis­be­hav­ior out­side of the legal system.”

Mon­roe leads the Foundation’s work with juris­dic­tions to sig­nif­i­cant­ly expand their use of diver­sion, which means hold­ing youth account­able for their behav­ior with­out resort­ing to legal sanc­tions, court over­sight or the threat of con­fine­ment. The alter­na­tive — arrest­ing young peo­ple and for­mal­ly pro­cess­ing their cas­es in juve­nile court — increas­es their like­li­hood of sub­se­quent arrests, school strug­gles and employ­ment chal­lenges.

Study 1: Police Encoun­ters By Eighth Grade Increase the Like­li­hood of Future Arrests for Black Youth

Researchers found that a far high­er share of Black stu­dents than white stu­dents were stopped and ques­tioned by police by the time they were in eighth grade, even though delin­quent behav­ior was rough­ly equal between the two groups. Expe­ri­enc­ing a police encounter by eighth grade dra­mat­i­cal­ly increased the like­li­hood of a future arrest for Black youth, but not for white youth. Indeed, Black stu­dents who report­ed they had expe­ri­enced a police encounter by eighth grade were 11 times more like­ly to be arrest­ed at age 20 than their white peers. The study reveals the com­pound nature of the dis­ad­van­tages to Black youth: they are more like­ly to have ear­ly con­tact with police than white youth, and ear­ly con­tact affects them more neg­a­tive­ly than it affects white youth.

Police encoun­ters rep­re­sent the first step in a com­plex process that exac­er­bates racial inequities,” wrote the authors of the study. The study tracked 261 Black or white non-His­pan­ic stu­dents in Seat­tle, Wash­ing­ton, begin­ning when they were in eighth grade.

Study 2: Black and Lati­no Youth are More Like­ly Than White Youth to Face Legal Con­se­quences After an Arrest

Race influ­ences whether youth are processed for­mal­ly through the juve­nile courts or alter­na­tive­ly, processed infor­mal­ly out­side of the court after an ini­tial arrest, accord­ing to a study of over 1,200 young peo­ple in three parts of the coun­try. The odds of being for­mal­ly processed — and, there­fore, hav­ing greater con­tact with the legal sys­tem — were 67% high­er for Black and Lati­no youth rel­a­tive to white youth, after account­ing for both legal and oth­er fac­tors. (The odds of being for­mal­ly arrest­ed did not dif­fer between Black and Lati­no youth.) These dis­par­i­ties are trou­bling, the authors not­ed, because youth whose cas­es were for­mal­ly processed proved more like­ly to be arrest­ed again, and less like­ly to suc­ceed in school and employ­ment lat­er in life. Once youth are arrest­ed, law enforce­ment offi­cials such as police and pro­ba­tion offi­cers often have dis­cre­tion over whether young peo­ple are for­mal­ly charged, for exam­ple, or let off with an infor­mal warn­ing. These sub­jec­tive deci­sions rely on a num­ber of fac­tors, includ­ing per­cep­tions of a youth’s risk to pub­lic safe­ty and of recidi­vism — two vari­ables the authors say are often con­flat­ed with a young person’s race.

The stud­ies dri­ve home the con­tin­ued struc­tur­al bias­es that dis­ad­van­tage Black youth and oth­er youth of col­or in our nation’s legal sys­tem, and the need to devel­op strate­gies that undo those struc­tures. Mon­roe points to diver­sion as one way of pro­mot­ing racial equi­ty. Deci­sion mak­ers should offer youth of col­or oppor­tu­ni­ties for diver­sion at lev­els that con­scious­ly counter the sig­nif­i­cant dis­par­i­ties that begin at arrest and per­sist through­out the juve­nile jus­tice sys­tem,” she says.

Read more about sup­port­ing youth in the juve­nile jus­tice system